Biotech IR Blog by Our CEO and Founder, Laurence Watts.
March 4, 2026
Who Are the Top 25 Investors in U.S. Public Biotechs?
Following on from our blog “Who Are the Top Venture Capitalists in U.S. Biotech?” – which detailed the largest investors in private biotechs – we thought we would turn our attention to the largest investors in U.S. public biotechs.
In the tables that follow, we present the leading investment managers ranked by the biotech holdings of their respective funds. The data comes from Ipreo and was pulled on February 12, 2026.
We have split our analysis into active funds (which could be worthy targets for any biotech’s investor outreach program) and passive funds (which would not).
As a reminder, passive funds are index trackers that own shares in biotechs purely because they are included in indexes such as the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index and the various Russell indexes (all the subject of other blogs in this series).
Active funds ranked by biotech holdings
| Rank | Institution | Biotech Holdings ($M) | # Biotech Holdings | City |
| 1 | Fidelity Management & Research | 44,593 | 392 | Boston |
| 2 | Capital World Investors (U.S.) | 38,300 | 30 | Los Angeles |
| 3 | Norges Bank Investment Management | 19,090 | 180 | Oslo |
| 4 | Wellington Management Company | 17,277 | 228 | Boston |
| 5 | Capital Research Global Investors (U.S.) | 17,189 | 18 | Los Angeles |
| 6 | T. Rowe Price Associates | 16,066 | 133 | Baltimore |
| 7 | Baker Brothers Investments | 15,029 | 77 | New York |
| 8 | BlackRock Investment Management (U.K.) | 13,070 | 295 | London |
| 9 | Janus Henderson Investors | 12,610 | 89 | Denver |
| 10 | Capital International Investors | 12,506 | 14 | San Francisco |
| 11 | J.P. Morgan Investment Management | 11,800 | 244 | New York |
| 12 | Primecap Management Company | 8,483 | 20 | Pasadena |
| 13 | BlackRock Advisors | 7,956 | 368 | New York |
| 14 | RA Capital Management | 7,599 | 63 | Boston |
| 15 | T. Rowe Price Investment Management | 7,109 | 62 | Baltimore |
| 16 | Amundi Asset Management | 6,930 | 166 | Paris |
| 17 | Avoro Capital Advisors | 6,519 | 21 | New York |
| 18 | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | 5,588 | 309 | New York |
| 19 | RTW Investments | 5,490 | 48 | New York |
| 20 | Franklin Advisers | 5,439 | 188 | San Mateo |
| 21 | Morgan Stanley Investment Management | 5,213 | 233 | New York |
| 22 | Citadel Advisors | 4,950 | 369 | Miami |
| 23 | Farallon Capital Management | 4,941 | 52 | San Francisco |
| 24 | AllianceBernstein | 4,814 | 215 | New York |
| 25 | Baillie Gifford & Company | 4,689 | 29 | Edinburgh |
Source: Ipreo.
- Note: we removed Dodge & Cox, Korean National Pension Service, and the broker-dealer UBS (which we believe was inaccurately classified by Ipreo) to create this list.
- There should be no surprises in the Top 10 names here.
- As a reminder: Capital World Investors focuses heavily on large-cap, global, and international equities, Capital Research Global Investors focuses on equity-related securities worldwide, and Capital International Investors focuses on large-cap, international, and U.S. companies, with a strong emphasis on research.
Can this list be refined to be more relevant for small- or mid-cap biotechs?
A cursory analysis of the table above reveals that both Capitol World Investors and Capital Research Global Investors have average position sizes of $1.3B and $955M respectively – a position those investors simply couldn’t replicate in a small- or mid-cap biotech.
As such, we present a moderated table below, where we have filtered the same data to only include investment managers whose average position is < $100M.
Active funds with an average position of < $100M
| Rank | Institution | Biotech Holdings ($M) | # Biotech Holdings | Average Position ($M) |
| 1 | Wellington Management Company | 17,277 | 228 | 75.8 |
| 2 | BlackRock Investment Management (U.K.), LTD | 13,070 | 295 | 44.3 |
| 3 | J.P. Morgan Investment Management | 11,800 | 244 | 48.4 |
| 4 | BlackRock Advisors | 7,956 | 368 | 21.6 |
| 5 | Amundi Asset Management S.A.S. | 6,930 | 166 | 41.7 |
| 6 | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | 5,588 | 309 | 18.1 |
| 7 | Franklin Advisers | 5,439 | 188 | 28.9 |
| 8 | Morgan Stanley Investment Management | 5,213 | 233 | 22.4 |
| 9 | Citadel Advisors | 4,950 | 369 | 13.4 |
| 10 | Farallon Capital Management | 4,941 | 52 | 95.0 |
| 11 | AllianceBernstein, L.P. | 4,814 | 215 | 22.4 |
| 12 | Millennium Management | 4,688.58 | 329 | 14.3 |
| 13 | Pictet Asset Management S.A. | 4,235.75 | 165 | 25.7 |
| 14 | Deerfield Management Company | 4,215.72 | 51 | 82.7 |
| 15 | Columbia Threadneedle Investments (U.S.) | 4,010.79 | 194 | 20.7 |
| 16 | TIAA-CREF Investment Management | 3,872.20 | 237 | 16.3 |
| 17 | Adage Capital Management | 3,839.63 | 107 | 35.9 |
| 18 | Invus Public Equities Advisors | 3,764.16 | 71 | 53.0 |
| 19 | Jennison Associates | 3,697.82 | 44 | 84.0 |
| 20 | Point72 Asset Management | 3,683.86 | 204 | 18.1 |
| 21 | Managed Account Advisors | 3,575.10 | 102 | 35.1 |
| 22 | UBS Asset Management (Switzerland) | 3,541.30 | 180 | 19.7 |
| 23 | Fidelity Institutional Asset Management | 3,531.83 | 107 | 33.0 |
| 24 | Mellon Investments Corporation | 3,485.30 | 277 | 12.6 |
| 25 | American Century Investment Management | 3,416.42 | 230 | 14.9 |
Source: Ipreo.
- Although this new table excludes Fidelity Management and Research, it now includes Fidelity Institutional Asset Management in 23rd place.
- Again, this list contains few surprises and is in keeping with our own real-world experience.
Passive funds ranked by biotech holdings
Lastly, although passive funds cannot be marketed to as part of investor targeting (since they are simply tracking indexes that include biotechs), we present the Top 25 passive institutions ranked by biotech holdings – so that biotechs can at least be familiar with the names (which are more than likely to appear on quarterly 13F reports).
| Rank | Institution Name | Biotech Holdings ($M) | # Biotech Holdings | City |
| 1 | The Vanguard Group | 110,189 | 561 | Malvern |
| 2 | BlackRock Fund Advisors | 65,397 | 581 | San Francisco |
| 3 | State Street Investment Management | 41,282 | 612 | Boston |
| 4 | Geode Capital Management | 27,831 | 569 | Boston |
| 5 | Invesco Capital Management | 17,420 | 277 | Chicago |
| 6 | Charles Schwab Investment Management | 10,339 | 333 | San Francisco |
| 7 | Northern Trust Investments | 7,735 | 457 | Chicago |
| 8 | Dimensional Fund Advisors | 6,973 | 354 | Austin |
| 9 | Legal & General Investment Management, LTD | 5,884 | 309 | London |
| 10 | Renaissance Technologies | 4,818 | 302 | New York |
| 11 | BlackRock Advisors (U.K.) | 4,650 | 320 | London |
| 12 | AQR Capital Management | 4,103 | 204 | Greenwich |
| 13 | Parametric Portfolio Associates | 4,059 | 310 | Seattle |
| 14 | UBS Asset Management (U.K.) | 3,058 | 161 | London |
| 15 | DWS Investments UK | 3,015 | 277 | London |
| 16 | Arrowstreet Capital | 2,691 | 56 | Boston |
| 17 | State Street Global Advisors, LTD | 2,504 | 325 | London |
| 18 | Schweizerische Nationalbank | 2,067 | 116 | Zürich |
| 19 | First Trust Advisors | 1,876 | 96 | Wheaton |
| 20 | Qube Research & Technologies | 1,850 | 129 | London |
| 21 | Jane Street Capital | 1,793 | 306 | New York |
| 22 | LSV Asset Management | 1,751 | 17 | Chicago |
| 23 | Vanguard Investments Australia | 1,746 | 188 | Melbourne |
| 24 | Pacer Advisors, Inc. | 1,646 | 34 | Malvern |
| 25 | Assenagon Asset Management | 1,577 | 74 | Munich |
Source: Ipreo.
- Note that State Street Investment Management is based in Boston, while State Street Global Advisors, LTD is based in London.